To watch or not to watch…

Recently American academy of pediatrics urged the parents to limit the media exposure to young children especially infants and toddlers. It suggested that the media provided a constant background noise and also influenced the quality of time that parents spent with their children. They also suggest that so called educational programs may not really provide any educational benefits especially for children under 2 years of age. Young children do not benefit as much from media as they do from a real life interaction.

A study on fast mapping (ability to learn new words quickly) in toddlers exposed to educational programs on television was conducted by Krcmar, Grela and Lin (2007). They compared the fast mapping in joint referencing (adults present the word in live interaction) vs child program condition. Word learning was significantly better in joint reference condition stressing the importance of human interaction. Another study by Krcmar in 2011 also supported these findings and showed that there was no correlation between visual attention and the learning. This means that the fact that children look at the media does not mean that they are getting anything out of it. Following video by Patricia Kuhl on linguistic genius of babies also supports the importance of a live interaction in language learning.

These are interesting findings and support the advice SLP’s have been giving the parents of children with language learning difficulties, talk to your child. In my opinion, as a mother of a 6 month old, I strongly feel that spending one on one time with children provides for quality communication. There is the obvious question of what to do when you have to run errands and need to let the child be on its own for some time. Letting children play on their own may be the answer as it promotes problem solving. However the question is how realistic is it to limit the media exposure to young children. How do you balance this inevitable exposure to media with a live human interaction? What suggestions do you give to parents who ask questions on media exposure? According to me it definitely is a balancing act and also a responsibility on the part of parents to be aware of the content that the child is being exposed to. Media exposure with adult interaction/explanation  could be more beneficial than solitary media exposure. What do you think? To watch or not to watch……..

5 thoughts on “To watch or not to watch…

  1. I completely agree with you. Excessive media exposure to young children does not enhance language learning rather it may degrade it. In my opinion, children should be encouraged to engage in social interactions with peers and adults, read story books and media exposure should be limited with parental controls. Also, as you had suggested media exposure with adult interaction makes it more beneficial where children get to discuss about the programmes they watch.

    • Sorry have been away for quite a long time. I have been busy with my 10 month old son seeing him achieve some major physical and cognitive milestones.
      You are right Smeeta, I have seen this with my son. Whenever we play some video for him, he does show initial attention but fails to sustain it unless there is someone around talking or acting out the stuff shown on the video. He has taken quickly to some rhymes that we play for him because we act them out together.

      • As a mom, I want my son to be able to talk to his peers about the shows he watches but on the other hand I want to be in control of what he watches.
        We have now started with a DVD from Baby Einstein. It has real life imagery appropriate for young babies, so they are exposed to pictures and videos of animals, puppets, toys etc and it is going well so far.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>